Category : Pascal Source Code
Archive   : 3DLAB110.ZIP
Filename : L3D.DOC

Output of file : L3D.DOC contained in archive : 3DLAB110.ZIP


This is the collection of Turbo Pascal routines to implement some
3-D graphics. Just type L3D, and press ENTER at DOS prompt to get
yourself in the 3-dimensional labyrinth. Instruction are provided
online, just press F1, if you don't know what to do with it.

This software was written because I wanted to know how might one
do things like Wolfenstein-3D, and the best way was to do it
myself. So why I have released these (buggy?) routines to shareware?
Well, I think that I have nothing to loose, or have I?

The source is slightly documented, but try to understand; I like to
write programs, not documents. I think that clearly written program
is 80% of the document, but I don't know if this is the case with
Labyrinth-3D. (I might document the possible next verion little
better, but this is not a promise).

If you start fooling around with the source, sooner or later you
will notice the lack of TxtMap.TPU source. There the shareware
idea comes to play. You have to register to get it. Registeration
fee is only $20 (or 100 Fmk), and should be sent to:

Kimmo Fredriksson
Silvontie 38
37740 Haukila

You can send any comments and critics to same address. You can
contact me via the Internet too: [email protected]

And finaly the standard disclaimer: This author will not be
resbonsible of any problems or damages associated with the use
of Labyrinth-3D, whether they be physical, financial, psychological
or theoretical. If you use L3D, you use it at your own risk!

  3 Responses to “Category : Pascal Source Code
Archive   : 3DLAB110.ZIP
Filename : L3D.DOC

  1. Very nice! Thank you for this wonderful archive. I wonder why I found it only now. Long live the BBS file archives!

  2. This is so awesome! 😀 I’d be cool if you could download an entire archive of this at once, though.

  3. But one thing that puzzles me is the “mtswslnkmcjklsdlsbdmMICROSOFT” string. There is an article about it here. It is definitely worth a read: