Dec 092017
| Check your 386 chip. Further info on PUSHAD/POPAD bug (ref 386popad.zip) with experimental analysis of exactly what is going wrong. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| File Name | File Size | Zip Size | Zip Type |
| 386BUGS.ASM | 1132 | 508 | deflated |
| 386BUGS.DOC | 536 | 324 | deflated |
| 386BUGS.EXE | 846 | 137 | deflated |
| X.ASM | 1742 | 824 | deflated |
| X.DOC | 1605 | 869 | deflated |
| X.EXE | 1397 | 433 | deflated |
Download File 386BUGS2.ZIP Here
Contents of the 386BUGS.DOC file
This postings is a test program for a bug in the 386 processor. It
seems potentially serious.
The submitter [email protected] says:
It seems that a new bug in some 386 processors has been discovered.
Mine failed the test and the system acted weird after running the
program. I think the bug messed up the stack or something. Everything
was ok again after I rebooted. I'm not real happy about having a
defective processor, Bill. You may wish to tell your 386 mailing list
about this bug. It looks serious.
seems potentially serious.
The submitter [email protected] says:
It seems that a new bug in some 386 processors has been discovered.
Mine failed the test and the system acted weird after running the
program. I think the bug messed up the stack or something. Everything
was ok again after I rebooted. I'm not real happy about having a
defective processor, Bill. You may wish to tell your 386 mailing list
about this bug. It looks serious.
December 9, 2017
Add comments